Mr. Donnelly's Math Page

Factoring

Home | Algebra II A | Algebra II C | Advanced Algebra and Trigonometry | Roxbury Lacrosse | Links

The following was barrowed from DR. MATH to find more stuff like it click on the links page and go to the DR. MATH link.
 
Suppose you have an equation like y = x^2 - 5x + 6
 and
                                    you'd like to plot the equation. You could start putting in values 
of
                                    x, and getting corresponding values of y:
 
  x = 1,  
                                    y = 1^2 - 5(1) + 6 = 2
 
  x = 2,  
                                    y = 2^2 - 5(2) + 6 = 0
 
and so on. But how do you know which values to choose for x?  
It
                                    turns out that many quadratic equations can be written in a 
different
                                    form, which looks like y = (x - 2)(x - 3) 
 
What's the _point_ of writing it this way?  Well,
                                    note that right away 
we can find the places where the graph
                                    of the equation crosses the 
x-axis. How? By setting y = 0:
 
  0 = (x - 2)(x - 3)
 
Now, the _only_ way that you can multiply two things together and get 
zero is if at least one of them is zero. Does that make sense? So we 
know that the only values of x for which this equation can be true are 
x = 2, 0 = (2 - 2)(2 - 3)
or
                                    x = 3, 0 = (3 - 2)(3 - 3)
At every other value for x, you have
                                    to get something besides zero. 
So this tells us the locations
                                    of the points where the graph crosses 
the x-axis:  (2,0) and (3,0).  
Now,
                                    we also know that parabolas are symmetric, so if the parabola 
crosses
                                    the line at these points, then the vertex of the parabola - 
the
                                    highest or lowest point, depending on whether it opens up or 
down
                                    - must be exactly halfway between these, at x = 2.5. 
 
To find the location of that point, we substitute this value into the 
equation: y = (2.5 - 2)(2.5 - 3)
=
                                    (0.5)(-0.5)
= -0.25
 
So now we know where the vertex is:  (2.5,
                                    -0.25). 
From these three points, it's easy to sketch the graph.
                                    So that's one 
reason we want to be able to factor equations
                                    this way. Here is 
another:
Sometimes
                                    a problem leads to an equation like 
 
      x^2 - 5x + 6
  y = ____________

                                    x^2 + 2x - 8
 
Now,
                                    this is pretty messy. But note that we can factor both the 
numerator
                                    and denominator:
 
      (x - 2)(x - 3)
  y = ______________
      (x - 2)(x + 4)
 
      (x - 2)   (x - 3)
    = _______ * _______
      (x - 2)   (x
                                    + 4)
 
      (x - 3)
    = _______
      (x + 4)
 
which is a much nicer equation to deal with.
 
The point I'm trying to make is that factoring quadratic (and other) 
equations isn't just something that math teachers made up to torture 
math students. If you can factor a quadratic, it becomes much easier 
to deal with. You can't always do it, but if you can, it's almost 
always a good idea. 
 
Now, the reason I explained all that wasn't just to test your ability 
to stay awake, but to try to give you enough context about what's 
going on that if you _forget_ how to factor an equation, you'll be 
able to figure it out again from scratch. 
 
The basic idea is a very general one, which pops up over and over 
again in mathematics. To change something from one form to another, 
you write it in the other form using parameters; and then you figure 
out what the parameters have to be.  
 
In this
                                    case, we know that we want to end up with something that looks 
like
                                    (x + a)(x + b). So we go ahead and pretend that we've already 
found
                                    it:
 
  x^2 - x - 12 = (x + a)(x + b) 
 
Now, we can expand the right side, to get something in the same form 
as the left side, but using our new parameters (a and b):
 
  x^2 - x - 12 = (x + a)(x + b) 
 =
                                    x^2 + (a+b)x + ab
 
Now this is pretty interesting, because if these are really equal, 
then they have to have the same coefficients:
 
                  
                                    ab = -12
           
                                                           
                                    
  x^2
                                    - x - 12 = x^2 + (a+b)x + ab
                       
                                    
                 (a+b) = -1 
 
So this
                                    gives us two constraints:
 
  1) 
                                    a + b = -1
 
  2) 
                                    a * b = -12
 
This doesn't _look_ like much of an improvement, but actually we have 
a third constraint that turns out to be very helpful:
 
  3)  a and b are both integers
 
How does
                                    that help?  Well, it turns out that there just aren't that 
many ways to multiply two integers to get -12. 
                                    In fact, here are all 
the possibilities:
 
   a     b
  ---  
                                    ---
   -1    12
    1   -12
   -2    
                                    6
   
                                    2    -6
   -3     4
    3    -4
 
And if we check the sums, we'll find that only one pair of values 
will add up to -1:
 
   a    
                                    b    a+b
  ---   ---   ---
  
                                    -1    12    11
    1   -12   -11
   -2     6     4
    2    -6   
                                    -4
   -3     4     1
    3    -4   
                                    -1    <----- The winner!
 
So now we know that, if we did everything correctly, the factored 
version of the equation must be
 
  x^2 - x - 12 = (x + 3)(x + -4)
 
               = (x
                                    + 3)(x - 4)
 
To
                                    be sure, we always want to check to make sure that we didn't make a 
mistake.
                                    In this case, we do that by plugging -3 and 4 into the 
original
                                    equation:
 
  (-3)^2 - (-3) - 12 = 9 + 3 - 12
 
                    
                                    = 0
 
   (4^2) - (4) + 12  = 16 - 4 + 12
 
                    
                                    = 0
 
So
                                    we're done.  
 
When it works, the key to finding the values of a and b is to narrow 
down the possibilities using the fact that a*b has to be equal to the 
constant at the end. When you get some practice at this, you'll be 
able to do it in your head without even writing anything down.  For 
example, suppose you see
 
  x^2 - 6x + 8
 
The first thing you look at is the sign of the final term. It's 
positive, and the only way that you can get a positive term is by 
multiplying two positives, or two negatives. So the possibilities are 
 
    1 *  8
   -1 * -8
    2 *  4
  
                                    -2 * -4
   
                                    
and the only pair that adds up to -6 is the final pair.
                                    So the answer 
must be 
 
  (x - 2)(x - 4)
 
But the
                                    point is, this can look like magic if you don't understand 
_why_
                                    you need to find the factors of the final constant. 
 
If the final constant is negative, e.g., 
 
  x^2 + 2x - 15
 
then the
                                    factors have to have opposite signs:
 
  -1 * 
                                    15 
   1
                                    * -15
  -3 *   5
   3 *  -5
 
As always, only one pair - the third one - gives the right sum, so the 
answer must be 
 
  (x - 3)(x + 5)
 
So what
                                    at first seems to be this whole big messy process boils down 
to
                                    a very simple shortcut at the end. However, if you just try to 
memorize
                                    the shortcut, you're likely to forget it under pressure - for 
example,
                                    during a test. But if you understand _why_ the shortcut 
works,
                                    then you can work it out from scratch whenever you need it.